Bradford County PA, You Are Being Misled

And here's why. This is from the Key­stone Edge site, a seem­ing­ly rep­utable out­fit cov­er­ing eco­nom­ic change and oth­er pro­grams in cer­tain area of MI and PA.

Some drillers, includ­ing Range Resources and Chesa­peake Ener­gy, are sim­ply reusing their water. By the end of last year, Range was recy­cling all of its "pro­duced" water, or the liq­uid that flows up in a well that's pro­duc­ing gas after the frac­tur­ing process. Chesa­peake recent­ly announced its Aqua Renew pro­gram, an ini­tia­tive to recy­cle all of the water the com­pa­ny uses in the Mar­cel­lus (). Already, that process is reusing 4.3 mil­lion gal­lons a month.

Seems like a good thing, reusing 4.3 mil­lion gal­lons of water, right? Until you find out, in Chesa­peake Energy's own presskit, that 4.3 mil­lion gal­lons is less than minis­cule. That amount won't even hydrofrack one well. See my cut below, empha­sis mine.

And, if you fol­low the mon­ey trail left by this seem­ing­ly innocu­ous arti­cle, this is what you find. Key­stone Edge is one of many sites owned by Issue Media Group, who received fund­ing for Key­stone Edge from The Team Penn­syl­va­nia Foun­da­tion,  a com­pa­ny with investors of many kinds. Among them, com­pa­nies like Alleghe­ny Ener­gy, Brad­ford Ener­gy Com­pa­ny Inc., Con­sol Ener­gy, First Ener­gy, etc., with some water-pro­cess­ing equip­ment sales and engi­neer­ing firms mixed in. No won­der the drilling seems so nec­es­sary and right and good.

By the way, Chesapeake's reusing 4.3 mil­lion gal­lons a month. Bul­ly for them. How many wells are in Brad­ford Coun­ty? 853, by the government's count, of which 201 are Chesa­peake wells (see here for details).Which makes, um, 1,105,500,000 gal­lons used to frack for Chesa­peake alone. And they talk of sav­ing 4.3 mil­lion as if it's any­thing more than the lit­tle old lady piss­ing in the sea.

Make no mis­take, most of the rest of that water is end­ing up in trout streams, wells, rivers, and unsight­ly open pits, wait­ing for recla­ma­tion. Read this arti­cle for a bit of the oth­er side.

By Han­nah Abelbeck

As the scale and pace of Mar­cel­lus gas well drilling picks up, peo­ple in rur­al Penn­syl­va­nia are learn­ing how to fight traf­fic jams, research deed his­to­ries, encounter the FBI, self-mon­i­tor streams and light their tap water on fire.

Inno­va­tions in drilling tech­nol­o­gy have fueled the rush to extract nat­ur­al gas from the Mar­cel­lus shale, a geo­log­i­cal for­ma­tion that under­lies 70 per­cent of Penn­syl­va­nia and por­tions of Cen­tre County.

The gas rush is on, and mon­ey is fuel­ing all of it. Com­pa­nies and lend­ing insti­tu­tions will­ing to invest the big mon­ey need­ed up front want a fast return, result­ing in quick­er and more intense drilling in rur­al areas des­per­ate to save their slug­gish economies. Res­i­dents are sign­ing leas­es, des­per­ate to sup­ple­ment sag­ging incomes. Work­ers, hun­gry for jobs, hope to sign up for long, dan­ger­ous work days, if they can get them. And the indus­try pro­motes the ben­e­fits and down­plays the costs of mas­sive spec­u­la­tion, while oppos­ing reg­u­la­tions that might shrink prof­it margins.

Mean­while, the envi­ron­ment, health, and finan­cial well-being of Penn­syl­va­nia res­i­dents is at risk like nev­er before.

I'm dis­gust­ed, so I'm going to quit writ­ing now. I'll be back, though.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.